- Campaigners accuse Camden Council of withholding information regarding the Bacton Low Rise Estate redevelopment.
- Original 2018 scheme, built in the 1960s and demolished in 2018, aimed to create hundreds of new council homes.
- The project initially delivered 46 council homes and 21 private flats; progress stalled after 2017.
- In 2024, Camden Council commissioned Mount Anvil to continue the regeneration, proposing high-rise developments.
- Plans include doubling the number of homes, with buildings up to 26 storeys tall.
- Campaigners claim the new scheme will lead to gentrification, reducing social housing and driving up rents.
- Campaigners, under Bacton Towers Action (BTA), report public disapproval in community consultations.
- Camden Leader Richard Olszewski defends the process, citing multiple community engagement events.
- Campaigners, including Sir Michael Palin, urge for a public meeting; council refuses, citing ongoing planning processes.
- The scheme remains in pre-application stage, pending approval and local policy assessment.
Why Are Campaigners Critical of the Proposed Regeneration?
According to reports from The Standard by Julia Oertli of Bacton Towers Action (BTA), local campaigners feel they have been kept in the dark about significant changes to the original plan. The initial project, developed with community support, aimed to rejuvenate the Bacton Low Rise Estate, which was built in the 1960s. However, in 2024, Camden Council commissioned the private developer Mount Anvil to overhaul the project, leading to a new blueprint that includes towering high-rises and a significant reduction in social housing.
How Do the New Plans Differ from the Original?
The original scheme prioritized low-rise council housing that incorporated the existing community fabric. As reported by The Guardian journalist Sarah Johnson, the new plans propose building high-rise blocks up to 26-storeys tall, relegating social housing residents to segregated, low-rise flats. Julia Oertli stated to LDRS that “all of a sudden, the original scheme was entirely dropped.” She criticised the scheme for excluding community members from consultations and for the plan’s reduction of social housing to only 26 per cent, creating concerns about gentrification and displacement.
What Are Campaigners’ fears regarding gentrification and housing affordability?
Campaigners fear that the redevelopment will intensify London’s housing crisis. By bringing another 1,000 residents to an already densely populated area without offering sufficient new infrastructure or services, rent prices may spike. Sir Michael Palin and other locals have expressed concern over the potential loss of social housing and increased rent burdens, which could marginalise existing residents.
How Has Camden Council Responded to Opposition?
In a letter to The Independent, Camden Council Leader Richard Olszewski asserted that the scheme was still in the pre-application stage and that community engagement had been extensive. He highlighted three rounds of consultation, 14 coffee mornings, and five ‘Meet the Developer’ events, claiming to have listened to residents’ concerns. Olszewski also pointed out that residents could still provide feedback during fortnightly drop-in sessions. He maintained that the council valued public input but asserted that a full public meeting was unnecessary at this stage.
How Have Community Members Been Involved?
BTA organised a stall at Camden’s Queens Crescent Market to gauge local opinion, reporting “overwhelming disapproval” among residents. Campaigners allege that the consultation process was inaccessible and dismissive; Mick Farrant, a BTA member, recounted pressing for site visits and a working group, only to be told it would take “a lot of work.” Additionally, campaigners expressed concern about the developer Mount Anvil’s online consultation, citing a message that accused “hostile groups/individuals” of trying to skew results.
What Has Been the Response from Mount Anvil?
As of this report, Mount Anvil has not responded to requests for comment. Campaigners remain sceptical about the consultation’s fairness and transparency and have called for direct engagement with the community.
How Have Local Politicians Responded?
Camden Council Leader Richard Olszewski responded to the campaign’s open letter, praising the community’s concern but denying the need for a public meeting. He emphasised that “the views are being taken seriously” and that consultations are ongoing. Olszewski reiterated that the proposed development is in the pre-application phase awaiting planning approval, which will involve formal assessment against local policies.
Will the Scheme Be Approved?
The scheme’s approval hinges on the planning authority’s review. Camden Council asserts that the project is still at an early stage, with continued engagement and refinement. However, campaigners remain doubtful, citing the perceived lack of meaningful dialogue and the scale of changes being proposed.
What Are the Broader Implications of the Camden Schemes for London’s Housing Crisis?
The controversy over the Camden redevelopment highlights broader tensions between urban regeneration, affordable housing, and community involvement. Many experts, including housing advocates and academics, argue that such large-scale developments risk creating “gentrification corridors,” displacing lower-income residents and exacerbating inequality in London.
Housing analyst David Bevan from the London Housing Forum warned that “in many cases, regenerations like these serve to benefit investors rather than existing communities.” The Camden case exemplifies this pattern, with campaigners fearing that the scheme prioritises private profit over social sustainability.
What Are the Next Steps in the Planning Process?
The planning application for the Bacton estate regeneration is yet to be submitted formally. Once it is, it will undergo statutory consultation and review by Camden’s planning officers. The council has committed to ongoing community engagement, but anti-gentrification activists are urging for more transparency and democratic decision-making.
Will the Campaigns Lead to Changes?
Community groups and local residents are actively campaigning to influence the scheme’s design. The open letter from Sir Michael Palin and hundreds of others is a call for greater transparency and genuine dialogue. The outcome will depend largely on the planning authority’s assessment and political will to balance development with community needs.
The Camden regeneration project, particularly the proposed overhaul of the Bacton Low Rise Estate, remains a contentious issue. Its critics, including national figures like Sir Michael Palin, argue that it risks turning a working-class, community-oriented neighbourhood into a high-rise investment zone. The council insists it has engaged extensively but critics object to a perceived lack of transparency and genuine community involvement. As the scheme advances through planning stages, the debate underscores the crucial need to balance development with social justice and community cohesion in London’s housing policy.
