Saw-Wielding Shoplifter Jailed 10 Years After Brutal Store Attack Enfield 2026

Key Points

• A 22-year-old man, Tedros Menges, has been jailed for ten years for a violent attack on shop staff at a store in Enfield, north London, after a failed shoplifting attempt.
• Menges initially tried to steal a pair of jogging bottoms but fled when staff challenged him, leaving his mobile phone behind.
• He returned to the store unarmed to retrieve his phone and was refused it by staff in line with store policy.
• After being refused, he left and later came back armed with a saw, which he used to attack a security guard and threaten other staff.
• During the incident, he attacked a security guard with the saw and strangled the store manager, leaving two people injured.
• A panic alarm was activated and Metropolitan Police officers arrived at the scene within about two minutes, responding to reports of a violent incident.
• Officers arrested Menges in a nearby car park, and the arrest was captured on body‑worn camera footage.
• At Wood Green Crown Court, Menges was convicted of grievous bodily harm, non‑fatal strangulation, attempted robbery and threatening a person with an offensive weapon.
• He was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment and will remain on licence for an additional period following his release.
• Police and local media reports describe the incident as a serious example of violence faced by retail staff during shoplifting and attempted robbery incidents in Enfield.

Enfield (North London News) July 18, 2026 – A 22-year-old man, named as Tedros Menges, has been jailed for ten years after attacking retail staff with a saw, strangling a store manager and threatening other employees at a shop in Enfield following a failed attempt to steal jogging bottoms.

How did the saw-wielding shoplifting incident in Enfield unfold from the first theft attempt to the final arrest?

As reported by the Evening Standard in a piece titled “Moment saw-wielding shoplifter arrested after shocking attack on store staff – as he is jailed for 10 years”, a Metropolitan Police investigation established that the incident began when Tedros Menges attempted to steal a pair of jogging bottoms from a store in Enfield in July last year. According to the same report, he fled after being spotted by staff, abandoning his mobile phone in the shop as he escaped.

Coverage by MyLondon, under the headline

 “Enfield shoplifter attacked security guard with saw before strangling manager”,

states that Menges returned to the shop after realising he had left his mobile phone behind and asked for it back. Staff followed store procedure and refused to hand over the phone directly, which MyLondon reports as a key trigger point in the escalation of the incident.

A report in the Enfield Independent, “Man launched saw and strangling attack on store staff after failed shop lift”, explains that after this initial confrontation over the phone, Menges left the premises and later came back armed with a saw. The Enfield Dispatch, in its story “Saw-wielding Southbury shoplifter who attacked retail staff handed ten-year jail term”, similarly notes that he returned to the retail park location in Southbury, Enfield, carrying the saw and immediately confronted staff.

The Metropolitan Police, in an official news release titled 

“Saw-wielding shoplifter jailed following swift Met investigation”,

state that when Menges returned with the saw he attacked a security guard and then turned on the store manager, strangling them and threatening other staff members. SWNS (as carried in “Moment man arrested for attacking staff with saw – after failing to steal joggers”) reports that a panic alarm was activated by staff once the violence started, prompting a rapid police response.

The Met’s statement records that officers arrived on scene roughly two minutes after the alarm was triggered, by which time Menges had moved away from the store area.

According to the Evening Standard and the Met release, he was located and arrested by officers in a nearby car park, with the arrest filmed on body‑worn cameras. The Enfield Dispatch reports that both the security guard and manager suffered injuries, and that the violent outburst left staff and bystanders shaken.

What offences was Tedros Menges convicted of and what sentence did he receive at Wood Green Crown Court?

The Evening Standard reports that at Wood Green Crown Court, Tedros Menges, aged 22, was convicted of grievous bodily harm, non‑fatal strangulation, attempted robbery and threatening a person with an offensive weapon in connection with the Enfield attack. The Enfield Independent and Yahoo News UK (running the story 

“Man launched saw and strangling attack on store staff after …”)

confirm the same list of offences, noting that the charges reflect both the physical violence and the use of the saw as a weapon.

According to the Met’s official statement, Menges was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment following these convictions. The Evening Standard adds that he will remain on licence for a further period after his release, meaning he will be subject to supervision and conditions once he leaves custody.

The Enfield Dispatch likewise reports the ten‑year jail term, describing it as a significant sentence for a shoplifting incident that escalated into serious violence against staff.

The London Echo article

 “Shoplifter Sentenced to Ten Years for Violent Attack on Retail Staff”

 reiterates that the ten‑year term was handed down in relation to a violent incident at a store in Enfield on 12 July 2025, where Menges attacked a security guard, strangled the manager and threatened other employees. 

SWNS coverage emphasises that the sentence followed a “swift investigation” by the Metropolitan Police, tying it to the rapid response and evidence captured at the scene, including body‑worn video.

How did police describe the response to the attack and what evidence was used in the case?

In its official news update, the Metropolitan Police describe the case as an example of a swift response to a serious incident, stating that officers arrived at the location within about two minutes of a panic alarm being triggered by store staff.

The force notes that this rapid attendance enabled officers to locate and arrest Menges in a nearby car park shortly after the attack.

The Evening Standard and SWNS reports highlight that body‑worn camera footage captured the moment of Menges’s arrest, providing visual evidence for the investigation and subsequent court case.

According to the Enfield Independent, the Met’s investigation also drew on witness evidence from staff and any available store security footage, though individual pieces of CCTV are not described in detail in the public reports.

In commentary quoted by the Evening Standard, a Metropolitan Police spokesperson stated that the attack left two people injured and that the sentence reflects the severity of the offending, underlining the force’s view of the seriousness of violence against retail workers.

The Met news release also points to ongoing work with retailers to improve reporting and response to shoplifting incidents that involve or risk violence.

What have local and national media reported about the impact of the incident on retail staff and the wider Enfield community?

Local outlets including the Enfield Dispatch and Enfield Independent present the incident as part of a wider pattern of violent behaviour faced by retail and security staff in the borough.

Their reports focus on the fact that a dispute originating from a theft of jogging bottoms escalated into a serious attack involving a weapon and strangulation, causing physical harm and significant distress to the staff members involved.

National and London‑wide coverage, such as that from the Evening Standard, MyLondon and the Daily Express, link the case to broader concerns about violence in retail environments across the capital, noting that shoplifting incidents can quickly become dangerous when offenders arm themselves or target staff who challenge them.

While these outlets do not provide detailed community reaction quotes, they present the case as a serious crime in north London and emphasise the potential risk to ordinary workers and shoppers.

SWNS and syndications of its report underline that the incident began with an attempt to steal low‑value items, a pair of jogging bottoms, yet escalated into an event resulting in significant custodial time, which is highlighted to illustrate the consequences of threatening and attacking staff.

The Met’s statement stresses that officers will continue to respond robustly to violence and that cooperation with retailers remains important for preventing and investigating similar incidents.

Background to the Enfield saw attack case

Several outlets place the events in Enfield within a broader context of retail crime and violence against shop workers in London and the UK. Although the reports on Tedros Menges focus on this specific incident, they sit alongside a wider stream of stories about assaults on security guards and managers during shoplifting attempts.

For example, a separate BBC report from 2024 described a different case in which a shoplifter headbutted a security guard at a supermarket in Peterborough, resulting in a custodial sentence, underlining that such offences are not isolated to a single area.

Within Enfield, local coverage by the Enfield Dispatch and Enfield Independent indicates ongoing concern around crime at retail parks and high‑footfall shopping locations, although they do not provide detailed crime statistics in the pieces on Menges.

These reports typically stress that shop staff, security guards and managers are often on the front line when confronting suspected shoplifters, making them vulnerable to sudden, serious assaults when offenders resort to violence.

The Metropolitan Police, in their news archive, present the case as one of several prosecutions intended to send a clear message that violence in the context of shoplifting or attempted robbery will be met with strong investigative and prosecutorial action.

Their statement on the Menges case explicitly refers to the severity of the attack and mentions that the sentence reflects the seriousness of the offending and the injuries to the victims.

Explore More Enfield News

Outsourced Chase Farm Hospital staff strike over conditions, Enfield 2026

WW2 House of Secrets Museum Opens: Enfield, 2026

Prediction: How could this development affect retail staff, local shoppers and enforcement work in Enfield?

Based on the sentence and the accompanying police and media statements, it is reasonable to expect that the case will act as a clear deterrent message to individuals considering violent behaviour towards retail staff in Enfield and more widely in London, given the ten‑year custodial term imposed for an incident originating in attempted shoplifting.

For retail staff and security personnel, the outcome may reinforce confidence that serious assaults are being treated as major offences by the courts and the Metropolitan Police, particularly when weapons and strangulation are involved.

For local shoppers and the wider community in Enfield, media coverage highlighting the swift police response and successful prosecution may provide reassurance that violent incidents in retail settings are actively pursued and that officers can respond quickly when panic alarms or emergency calls are made.

At the same time, the incident is likely to encourage retailers and shopping centres to review and potentially tighten their security and staff‑safety procedures, aiming to minimise risks when confronting suspected shoplifters and handling disputes over property such as abandoned phones or goods.

From an enforcement and policy perspective, the case may contribute to ongoing discussions about retail crime, including the protection of shop workers and the need for clear reporting pathways, as highlighted in various police and media briefings on similar assaults across the UK.

In Enfield specifically, this prosecution could support stronger collaboration between the Metropolitan Police, local authorities and businesses in retail parks and town centres, with the aim of preventing future incidents and ensuring that when violent attacks occur, they are promptly reported, investigated and brought before the courts.